Pathological Demand Avoidance (PDA) and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) are two distinct profiles.
Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)is a neurodevelopmental disorder characterised by persistent patterns of inattention and/or hyperactivity-impulsivity that interfere with daily functioning or development. ADHD is widely recognised and clearly defined in all major clinical and diagnostic frameworks, such as the DSM-5 (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition) and the ICD-11 (International Classification of Diseases, 11th Revision).
Whereas Pathological Demand Avoidance (PDA) is a lesser known behavioural profile associated with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD), characterised by extreme avoidance of everyday demands. This resistance is often linked to a deep-seated anxiety about losing control or autonomy. However, PDA is not universally accepted as a formal diagnostic subtype in all clinical or diagnostic frameworks (such as the DSM-5 or ICD-11).
Both conditions can share traits, such as difficulties with emotional regulation and executive functioning, but their underlying motivations and behaviours differ significantly.
Understanding the differences between PDA and ADHD can help us provide the most effective support to individuals with either or both of these profiles. When an individual appears to present with characteristics of both PDA and ADHD, it can create a complex profile of needs and behaviours. This overlap may result in significant challenges in terms of implementing effective interventions or strategies to support the individual.
This article aims to help you learn to distinguish between Pathological Demand Avoidance and ADHD. In particular, learning to identify when demand avoidance is PDA or could be ADHD (or other social and communication disorders such as Oppositional Defiant Disorder).
First let’s begin by understanding what PDA and ADHD are.
What is Pathological Demand Avoidance (PDA)?
Pathological Demand Avoidance (PDA) is a complex behavioural profile characterised by an individual’s extreme avoidance of everyday demands and expectations. It is a subtype of Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) and is often misunderstood and challenging to diagnose. Unlike typical avoidance behaviours, PDA is not a chosen behaviour but a survival instinct to cope with anxiety and the need for control. Individuals with PDA experience a pervasive need to resist and evade demands, which can significantly impact their daily lives and social interactions
As a subtype of Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD), PDA involves unique traits that set it apart from other autism profiles. Autistic people with PDA often feel a strong need to maintain control over their environment and interactions. This causes the indvidiual to exhibit a heightened resistance to demands placed on them, including everyday requests, routines, and activities. This resistance is often linked to a deep-seated anxiety about losing control or autonomy as the prospect of complying with a demand may feel overwhelming or even threatening to their sense of security or self.
A hallmark of PDA is the intensity of the avoidance. This can manifest in various ways, such as avoiding simple tasks, refusing to engage in expected routines, or even withdrawing from situations altogether.
Oftentimes, the individual might create pretend scenarios in which they enter a make-believe world to create opportunity for demand avoidance. For example, this might present as the individual pretending to be a cat and therefore unable to take part in daily life normally.
When others place a demand the individual may exhibit behaviours designed to avoid demands, such as distraction, humour, excuses, negotiation, or outright refusal. If pressured there is a rapid escalation of behaviour including meltdowns or outbursts.
This extreme demand avoidance is often driven by an anxiety response, making traditional approaches to support less effective without attention given to reduce anxiety that underpins the behaviours.
By understanding PDA’s underlying motivations and recognising how its behaviours serve as coping strategies, we can develop more tailored approaches to support individuals with PDA. Strategies that avoid direct demands and offer flexibility can be particularly effective in creating a sense of safety and reducing the need for avoidance behaviour.
What is Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD)?
Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) is a neurodevelopmental condition that affects how individuals perceive, process, and interact with the world around them. It is characterised by differences in social communication, sensory processing, and behavioural patterns. These can include repetitive behaviours, intense interests, and challenges with flexibility in thinking.
ASD is a spectrum, meaning it presents differently in each individual, with varying strengths and challenges. Some may require significant support in daily life, while others live more independently.
PDA is considered a subset of autism, with its own unique traits centred around demand avoidance and the need for autonomy. For more information on autism, read our in-depth guide on Autism Spectrum Disorder.
Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is a neurodevelopmental disorder defined by a persistent pattern of inattention, hyperactivity, and impulsivity. These symptoms can vary widely in their presentation, with some individuals showing more pronounced inattentive traits, others more hyperactive-impulsive traits, or a combination of both.
Individuals with ADHD may exhibit avoidance behaviours, such as putting off tasks or avoiding demands. However, these behaviours are typically linked to difficulties with executive functioning, such as task initiation, organisation, or sustaining focus. Unlike PDA, where avoidance is driven by a deep need to protect autonomy, avoidance in ADHD is not motivated by a desire for control but rather by challenges in regulating attention or managing overwhelm.
The hallmark of ADHD is the variability in how these symptoms manifest, with individuals often alternating between hyperfocus and distractibility. This complexity means that tailored interventions, such as structured routines, task management strategies, and sometimes medication, are often most effective for individuals with ADHD. Recognising these differences helps avoid conflating ADHD with other conditions, such as PDA, where the underlying motivations for behaviours are distinct.
Confusing PDA and ADHD - Behavioural Similarities
The challenge begins for us, teachers, parents and care-givers, when trying to tell PDA and ADHD apart. Both conditions involve behaviours that may appear oppositional, inattentive, or impulsive, but the underlying motivations driving these behaviours differ significantly.
Both ADHD and PDA present with avoidance of everyday demands or activities, especially those perceived as difficult, boring, or overwhelming. Think 'washing up' or 'homework'.
This is often accompanied by intense emotional reactions, such as frustration or anger. Children with PDA or ADHD may struggle to follow through on instructions, leading to frustration for parents or teachers and these children may also resist structure in their environments.
The key to accurately identifying PDA or ADHD is to consider the underlying motivation for the behaviours observed. To do this, let us consider some example scenarios:
Refusing to Start Homework
Child A (PDA)
The child with PDA refuses to start their homework. They use strategies such as distraction, negotiation or outright defiance. As the demand is reinforced by the parent 'please do your homework', the child experiences sensory overload and becomes more prone to an outburst.
Child B (ADHD)
The child with ADHD is unable to start or concentrate on their homework. They are easily distracted by stimuli in the room, noises, toys and so on. The child finds it hard to sit still and is resistant to parenting strategies that involve asking them to sit quietly and finish their work. Eventually the child has an outburst.
In both of these examples, the child avoided the demand to complete their homework. Although neither child was able to do their homework, the reasons are distinctly different.
Child A's underlying cause is anxiety. The strategies used to avoid tasks are a coping strategy to avoid the anxiety triggering demands placed on them.
Child B's underlying cause stems from difficulty with executive functioning, such as focus, organisation, time management and motivation.
Challenging Behaviours in the Classroom
Child A (PDA)
The child frequently disrupts the class, chatting with peers or refusing to engage with lessons. They might actively avoid tasks by joking, pretending to misunderstand instructions, or even walking out of the room.
Child B (ADHD)
The child struggles to remain seated and is easily distracted, calling out answers or interrupting the teacher. They may unintentionally disrupt the class due to impulsivity or hyperactivity.
In these examples, both children have presented avoidance behaviours in the classroom but again, these are driven by different underlying factors. In the child with PDA the behaviours are coping strategies to avoid the demands placed on them, which trigger anxiety while in the child with ADHD, the behaviour is driven by difficulty regulating impulses and maintaining attention.
By observing the context of the behaviours and identifying the child’s underlying needs, parents and mental health professionals can tailor their support strategies more effectively. Consulting a behaviour support professional is crucial for providing tailored strategies and interventions to manage symptoms effectively. This distinction ensures that interventions address the root cause, whether that’s reducing anxiety for PDA or improving focus and impulse control for ADHD.
PDA and ADHD in Diagnostic Contexts
One of the reasons these conditions are sometimes hard to tell apart is that there is no formal recognition of PDA in the Diagnostic and statistical manual (DSM-5). PDA is widely considered a profile of the Autism Spectrum.
PDA behaviours are characterised by extreme demand avoidance, often due to anxiety and the need to preserve autonomy. These traits reflect broader ASD characteristics, including difficulty with flexibility and heightened sensitivity to external demands (sensory processing issues).
ADHD is a distinct diagnosis under the DSM-5, defined by two primary symptom clusters: inattention and hyperactivity/impulsivity. These behaviours are linked to executive function deficits and affect multiple settings (e.g., home, school, work). Unlike PDA, the avoidance behaviours seen in ADHD are not motivated by anxiety or control but by difficulty with focus, task initiation, or regulating impulses.
This makes PDA harder to recognise. The omission creates challenges as it can be overlooked or misdiagnosed as ADHD or ODD.
In addition, individuals with PDA often display socially strategic behaviours (e.g., charm, negotiation, distraction) to avoid demands, which can mask underlying autism traits. This can lead to PDA being missed in children who might otherwise meet the criteria for ASD.
Impact of Misdiagnosis
When PDA is misdiagnosed as ADHD interventions may alone be ineffective. Strategies for managing ADHD would be inappropriate for PDA, where the focus should be on reducing anxiety and avoiding confrontation.
This inevitably leads to frustration as the ADHD interventions fail potentially leading to increased stress for both the child and their support network.
The same is true if ADHD is misdiagnosed as PDA, however, it tends to be that PDA is misdiagnosed as ADHD because PDA is the lesser known condition.
Many professionals and advocacy groups argue for the inclusion of PDA as a formal subtype of ASD in diagnostic manuals like the DSM-5 or ICD-11. This could provide clearer guidelines for diagnosis and intervention.
Management Strategies for PDA and ADHD
Let's explore management strategies for Pathological demand avoidance and ADHD to see how they would differ from each other using example behaviours of concern.
Example Behaviour of Concern: Refusing to Get Ready for School
Both children resist getting dressed for school in the morning. They may ignore instructions, become upset, or attempt to avoid the situation entirely.
Management for a Child with PDA
The refusal stems from anxiety about the demand itself, often related to the loss of autonomy or fear of failure. Pressure to comply can heighten this anxiety, leading to escalation. Here are some practical strategies for supporting the child.
Reduce Anxiety by Offering Choices
Instead of saying, "You need to get dressed now," offer choices such as, "Would you like to wear the blue shirt or the red one?" Choices help the child feel in control, reducing the perceived demand.
Use Indirect Language
Frame requests in a less direct way, such as, "I wonder what it would feel like to wear your school uniform today," instead of issuing a command. This removes the pressure of compliance while gently guiding them toward the task.
Build Trust Through Collaboration
Involve the child in decision-making about their morning routine. For example, "What can we do together to make mornings easier?"
Create a Predictable Routine with Flexibility
While routines are important, allow flexibility when the child is struggling. For instance, they could bring their uniform in the car and dress once they feel ready.
Focus on Building Emotional Connection
Use humour or playful approaches to engage the child, such as pretending the uniform is "hiding" and needs to be "found."
Management for a Child with ADHD
The refusal may be due to inattention, impulsivity, or overwhelm. They may feel distracted, lose track of the task, or struggle to transition from one activity to another.
Use Clear, Step-by-Step Instructions
Break the task into smaller, manageable steps: "First, put on your socks. Next, grab your shirt." Provide gentle reminders or visual prompts if the child gets distracted.
Incorporate Movement Breaks
Allow the child to move between tasks. For example, they could hop to their dresser to get their shirt, releasing pent-up energy while staying engaged.
Create a Structured Morning Routine
Use a visual schedule with pictures or checklists to outline the steps of getting ready. Keep the routine consistent to reduce decision-making fatigue.
Provide Positive Reinforcement
Offer immediate praise or small rewards for completing each step: "Great job getting your socks on! What’s next on the list?" ADHD children often respond well to tangible reinforcement.
Reduce Distractions
Ensure the environment is free of distractions, such as toys or screens, during the getting-ready process.
Why Tailoring Strategies Matters
Using the wrong approach can exacerbate the behaviour. Positive Behaviour Support (PBS) is an effective intervention for PDA, particularly highlighting its adaptability for family use. For a child with PDA, direct commands or increased pressure may heighten anxiety and lead to meltdowns. For a child with ADHD, overly flexible or indirect strategies may lead to further distraction or task avoidance.
Conclusion
Understanding the differences between Pathological Demand Avoidance (PDA) and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is essential for providing effective support. While both conditions can involve demand avoidance and similar behaviours, the underlying motivations—whether anxiety-driven in PDA or related to executive functioning challenges in ADHD—require tailored strategies. Misdiagnosis or mismanagement can lead to increased stress for both the individual and their support network.
By addressing extreme avoidance in PDA with approaches that reduce anxiety and promote autonomy, and supporting ADHD with structured, focus-enhancing interventions, caregivers and professionals can help children develop the tools they need to navigate daily life. Early intervention is particularly vital for individuals with PDA, as it allows them to build coping strategies that can be carried into adulthood, helping manage adult pathological demand avoidance. These strategies not only enhance quality of life but also foster independence and resilience as the individual grows.
Ultimately, understanding the root causes of behaviour and responding with compassion and tailored approaches ensures that both children and adults with PDA or ADHD receive the support they need to thrive.
Related Articles